What should us do about darfur

Such a plan—which must be implemented multilaterally—would mark an important reversal from an approach that Khartoum has viewed as all bark and no bite. It would also reflect the fact that no single punitive measure in and of itself is likely to have much economic or legal impact, but the political impact of an array of measures that would steadily ratchet up the real pressure on Khartoum and gradually isolate regime officials as international pariahs would force a change in behavior in due course.

Such pressures would aim to support a peace and protection initiative that would seek a new or significantly amended peace deal and a U. Ultimately, President Bush will have to decide that the United States must pursue multiple objectives in Sudan with singular intensity. Currently, counterterrorism efforts remain the unspoken elephant in the Situation Room the room for Principals Committee meetings inside the White House preventing a more robust U.

While Washington and its allies must continue to ensure that the Sudanese remain sources of information for the war on terrorism, they must merge this counterterrorism imperative with the equally compelling goals of ending the crisis in Darfur and ensuring the full implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement for southern Sudan.

Walking, chewing gum, and whistling at the same time are prerequisites for a successful policy in Sudan. The stakes could not be higher. Time is running out for huge swaths of Darfur. Insecurity is increasing, and humanitarian access is shrinking rapidly.

The State Department recently reported that a staggering 1, villages have been damaged or destroyed in Darfur. Mortality rates are set to skyrocket as the crisis metastasizes into Chad and the Central African Republic.

Perhaps most ominously, recent withdrawals of aid personnel—in response to targeted violence—threaten to result in widespread famine and increased epidemics, as well as much more violence as the last external witnesses are removed from the scene. It would then construct a set of proposals that would build on those historical lessons, taking full advantage of all available tools in the crisis-response toolbox.

Sadly, no such energy or analytical attention is being focused on Sudan. Illustratively, a U. Recommendations The U. The United States should also signal its readiness to strike Sudanese military and intelligence assets, including aircraft and airfields, if necessary.

Download Position Paper PDF Download Fact Sheet PDF Opportunity 08 aims to help presidential candidates and the public focus on critical issues facing the nation, presenting policy ideas on a wide array of domestic and foreign policy questions. The project is committed to providing both independent policy solutions and background material on issues of concern to voters.

Susan E. The coup took place two and a half years after a mass uprising that toppled long-standing ruler Omar al-Bashir. Coming less than a year before a planned handover of power to civilians, the power grab was met with fury on the streets. Demonstrations have erupted in a defiant rejection of military rule.

They discuss potential splits within the security forces, the possible role played by outside governments, and the way the African Union and Western powers should respond. Click here to listen on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. This site uses cookies.

By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our privacy policy for more details. Andes Central America. Overkill: Reforming the Legal Basis for the U. War on Terror.